Is Forever 21 Makeup Cruelty Free

Hi kitties! Suzana here. I'k excited to share that our June Cruelty-Complimentary Kitty box ships before long! This month'south box contains a trunk sunscreen from Juice Dazzler! Yous can subscribe here, just act quickly since boxes are limited.

For the majority of these cases, the brands are sold in China, where animal testing is mandatory past law for foreign cosmetics. It'south important to read the fine print when reading brand policies, as many of them will claim to be cruelty-free but then include a clause well-nigh "except when required by law". If they are sold in stores in China, this clause then means that they are not a cruelty-free brand.

I've also included culling cruelty-gratis suggestions for each brand. Feel gratuitous to exit your favorite cruelty-free dupe suggestions in the comments below!

1. NARS

NARS was in one case a cruelty-complimentary staple make for so many. Unfortunately, earlier this yr, they updated their animal testing policy to reverberate their conclusion to join the Chinese marketplace. From now on, NARS is going to exam on animals where required by law, meaning they are no longer cruelty-free.

One expert thing that has come out of this horrible decision is that there has been so much media attention brought to their decision, which is helping to increase awareness about animal testing!

For cruelty-free alternatives to NARS, check out Stila, KVD Vegan Beauty, Jouer, Marc Jacobs Beauty and Smashbox.

2. 50'Oreal

L'Oreal has a notoriously misleading animal testing FAQ. They merits "Fifty'Oréal no longer tests whatever of its products or any of its ingredients on animals, anywhere in the world. Nor does L'Oréal consul this task to others." However, they practice sell their products in China where animal testing is mandatory for strange cosmetics. They address this loophole in their policy as well: "An exception could exist made if authorities required it for human safety or regulatory purposes." In gild words, they exercise fund animal testing of their finished products in China, where the practice is required by law.

50'Oreal owns tons of other brands, some of which are sold in China and share the same policy to test on animals where required by law, and some of which remain cruelty-complimentary despite the policy of their parent visitor (similar Urban Decay and NYX).

For cruelty-free alternatives to 50'Oreal from the drugstore, requite due east.l.f. a attempt! Their products are on point and they are more affordable than Fifty'Oreal.

3. Estée Lauder

Estée Lauder claims that they are "committed to the emptying of creature testing", withal they exercise test on animals where required by law. Since they sell their products in the Chinese market, where animal testing is required, and they aren't a cruelty-gratuitous company.

Similar L'Oreal, Estée Lauder likewise owns several other brands which are subject to this same policy.

Their Double Wear Liquid Foundation is incredibly pop, but fortunately there are some great cruelty-free alternatives! The Too Faced Born This Fashion Foundation and Smashbox Studio Skin Hydrating Foundation are both similar options.

4. MAC

MAC Cosmetics is probably ane of the well-nigh popular and well-known makeup brands of all time, and they used to exist a cruelty-complimentary brand, which can pb to some confusion as to their current policy. They are owned by Estée Lauder, whose animal testing policy is not to test on animals unless required by police (equally mentioned in a higher place). Because MAC is sold in Cathay, where brute testing is required, MAC isn't a cruelty-costless company.

If you're looking to supercede your MAC eyeshadows, I can't recommend Makeup Geek enough. Their eyeshadows are AMAZING! Equally for MAC's lipsticks, NYX has some great shade dupes, and as a bonus, they are a whole lot more than affordable.

v. Benefit

Benefit is i of those brands that everyone seems to remember is cruelty-costless, just unfortunately, they are NOT a cruelty-complimentary company. Their policy is not to test on animals unless required by constabulary. Their products are besides sold in mainland China, where animal testing is required. Benefit also currently sells its products in Sephora stores across Communist china and shows no intention of pulling out of Mainland china.

If you are fatigued to Do good because of their adorable retro packaging, you will LOVE the cruelty-free make theBalm Cosmetics!

six. Lancôme

Lancôme is owned by L'Oreal and inherits the aforementioned policy to test on animals where required past law. Since Lancôme is sold in stores in red china, it cannot exist considered a cruelty-gratuitous brand.

Some of Lancôme's most popular products are their mascaras, but I think the cruelty-free mascaras from Tarte and Pacifica are easily just as proficient if not better!

7. Make Up For Ever

Make Up For Ever is a popular French make owned by LVMH (Louis Vuitton / Moët Hennessy) which is sold at Sephora and used by many theatre and makeup artists alike. Sadly, they exam on animals. They sell their products in Prc, where animal testing is mandatory for strange cosmetics. Because of this, Brand Upward For E'er isn't considered to be a cruelty-costless brand.

8. Maybelline

Some other heavy hitter drugstore make, Maybelline also shares the aforementioned policy as their parent company Fifty'Oreal. They sell their products in China, where animal testing is mandatory for foreign cosmetics. Because of this, Maybelline isn't a cruelty-free brand.

For an affordable cruelty-free culling to Maybelline and other drugstore brands, ELF has tons of great options!

9. Rimmel London

Rimmel London claims to be "confronting animal testing", but in reality, they are not cruelty-free as they sell their products in China. When asked near why they are selling their products in China while they claim to be against beast testing, they state that "Chinese consumers have made it articulate they want Rimmel London. Information technology would not be correct to deprive them of the products they want to use and enjoy. Our industry continues to work together in encouraging the Chinese authorities to have more modernized non-fauna safety testing methods." Rimmel'south parent company Coty shares the same policy.

For a dupe for the Rimmel London Scandaleyes Retroglam Mascara, I highly recommend the Also Faced Ameliorate Than Sex Mascara! Not simply is it vegan, just information technology also won our best cruelty-gratuitous mascara reader poll!

x. Revlon

Like L'Oreal, Revlon is a privately held visitor which tests on animals where required past police force. Since they are sold in China, they are bailiwick to animal testing and thus not cruelty-free.

If you love Revlon's famous lipstick formula, requite Colourpop's Lippie Stix a endeavour. I establish the conception to exist very similar, and they are fifty-fifty more affordable than the Revlon ones!

11. CoverGirl

Covergirl went cruelty-gratuitous every bit of November 2018! Read the total commodity here.

Covergirl may use adorable kittens in their advertisement campaigns to give off a beautiful and cuddly epitome, but they still test on animals! They sell their products in China, where animal testing is mandatory for foreign cosmetics. Because of this, Covergirl isn't considered to be a cruelty-free brand. Its parent company Coty shares the same policy.

12. Clinique

Clinique is Not a cruelty-complimentary brand. Clinique is owned past Estée Lauder and its official animal testing policy is not to exam on animals except when required past police. Clinique is sold in mainland Prc, where animal testing is required by constabulary.

For a dupe of Clinique'due south ever-popular Stubby Sticks, attempt Tarte's LipSurgence Skintuitive Lip Tint. They are equally hydrating and beautiful!

13. Almay

Almay is owned by Revlon and shares the policy of their parent visitor to test on animals where required by constabulary. They are also sold in China, where animal testing is mandatory for strange cosmetics. As such, they are not a cruelty-free brand.

For a cruelty-costless alternative to their "dermatologist-tested" eye makeup, requite SheaMoisture's products a endeavour! As a bonus, they besides contain more than natural ingredients.

14. Max Factor

Max Factor is another drugstore brand which is primarily sold in Europe. They are also sold in People's republic of china, where animal testing is required, and they are therefore not a cruelty-free brand. Their parent company Coty shares the same policy to exam on animals where required by police force.

For a cruelty-free (and equally affordable) alternative to Max Factor, check out the brand Barry Thousand!

15. Bobbi Brown

Bobbi Brownish states that they test on animals where required past law. Since they sell their products in Prc, this means they are subject to animal testing and thus they are not a cruelty-costless brand. They are owned past Estée Lauder, which equally mentioned above, shares the same policy to test when required by police force.

For cruelty-gratis alternatives for Bobbi Brown's cult classic Long-Wear Gel Eyeliner, endeavor the Tarte Clay Pot Waterproof Shadow Liner and the Colourpop Crème Gel Colour.

16. Chanel

Like many of these brands, Chanel's animal testing policy is nowhere to be found on their website. Only their products are indeed sold in mainland Cathay, where animal testing is mandatory for strange cosmetics. Considering of this, Chanel tests on animals and cannot be considered cruelty-free.

If yous're looking for high-cease designer beauty but don't want to support animal testing, Marc Jacobs Beauty is a great luxury cruelty-costless option!

17. Bourjois

Bourjois is a pop French cosmetics brand. They were previously owned by Chanel simply were acquired past Coty in 2015. They share the aforementioned policy as their parent company to test on animals where required by police force. They sell their products in prc and every bit such, they are not cruelty-free.

For a similarly priced (only cruelty-free) European drugstore brand, try GOSH Copenhagen! I particularly love their Velvet Impact Lipsticks.

18. Giorgio Armani

While their website says "Giorgio Armani does not apply animals to test its products", this is very misleading. They are owned by 50'Oreal, and they share L'Oreal'south policy to exam on animals when required past law. Since Giorgio Armani's products are sold in people's republic of china, this, of grade, means they are non cruelty-gratuitous, as they are therefore field of study to animal testing.

For a cruelty-complimentary dupe for the "holy grail" Giorgio Armani Luminous Silk Foundation, try the Catrice Nude Illusion Foundation!

19. Tom Ford

Tom Ford is owned by Estée Lauder, and information technology shares their beast testing policy to test when required by police force. They are non considered cruelty-free, since they sell in China, where animate being testing is mandatory.

The Milani lipsticks are groovy cruelty-gratis affordable alternatives for the Tom Ford ones. They are only as creamy and opaque, and at a fraction of the cost!

twenty. Yves Saint Laurent

As with Giorgio Armani, Yves Saint Laurent is also endemic by 50'Oreal, and adheres to Fifty'Oreal's animal testing policy. As YSL products are sold in mainland Mainland china, they unfortunately are non cruelty-gratuitous.

The Catrice Re-Touch Light-Reflecting Concealer is an excellent cruelty-free dupe for the YSL Touch Éclat and it'due south about $36 cheaper!

21. Sephora Collection

While at that place are many cruelty-gratuitous brands sold in Sephora stores, sadly Sephora's ain make is Non cruelty-complimentary. Sephora sells its products in China where animate being testing is required by constabulary for strange cosmetics.

While it is hard to suggest an alternative brand since Sephora'south brand covers such a wide range of products, there are comparable options from e.l.f., NYX and Milani.

22. Shiseido

Shiseido is a luxury Japanese beauty brand over a century quondam. Information technology is likewise the parent company to brands such as NARS and Blank Escentuals (aka bareMinerals). Shiseido's policy states that it does not test its corrective products or ingredients on animals except when admittedly mandated by law, and upon further searching through their website (which is not made easy), I found some other clause that states "in Mainland china, in order to guarantee the condom of imported cosmetics, safe studies including animal testing may be required".

For a cruelty-free but equally upscale option, try the brand Charlotte Tilbury. The formulas of their cream eyeshadows and lipsticks are also very similar to those of Shiseido.

23. Burberry

There is misinformation about whether Burberry tests on animals, and unfortunately the truth is that they do test where required by constabulary. Since Burberry is sold in mainland China, they cannot exist considered cruelty-free.

For a cruelty-gratis alternative to their unique eyeshadows, I would recommend the cruelty-free brand Illamasqua, which sells every bit deluxe eyeshadows.

24. Dior

Dior is owned past LVMH (Louis Vuitton / Moët Hennessy). Like many other luxury brands, Dior tests on animals. They sell their products in China, where animal testing is mandatory for foreign cosmetics. Because of this, Dior isn't considered to be a cruelty-complimentary brand.

A good alternative to the Diorshow Mascara is the Urban Disuse Perversion Mascara. Its thick mascara wand and formula are very like to Dior'due south.

25. La Mer

La Mer is an incredibly expensive luxury makeup and skincare brand endemic by Estée Lauder. Like their parent company, they exam on animals when required by police force. Since their products are sold in mainland Mainland china, this means they are not cruelty-costless.

Since La Mer'due south makeup is formulated with unique ingredients, it is a fleck challenging to detect exact dupes. However, I would definitely recommend the foundations and other products from 100% Pure, as they have luxurious formulations that are a flake more affordable.

26. Guerlain

Guerlain is endemic by LVMH (Louis Vuitton / Moët Hennessy). They merits that they "are strongly opposed to animal testing and have developed recognized expertise in alternatives to animal testing". Withal, they sell in mainland Communist china, which unfortunately refutes this statement. Therefore, they cannot be considered cruelty-free.

If you like Guerlain's Meteorites, you volition definitely dear Hourglass's Ambient Lighting Powders!

27. Avon

Avon claims to be the commencement major cosmetic company to finish animal testing nearly 25 years agone, but in reality they're authorizing and paying local officials in China to test on animals for them and then they can sell their products there. While they merits to accept "a deep respect for creature welfare", it seems to be part of careful diction to distract from the fact that they are not cruelty-complimentary.

Jordana'southward eyeliners are said to be good dupes for Avon'southward. They are easy to detect in most drugstores and they are cruelty-free!

28. Mary Kay

Similarly to Avon, Mary Kay's representatives are sometimes responsible for misinformation regarding Mary Kay's animal testing policy. While they are very vocal well-nigh "non testing on animals", they actually do test on animals where required by law. In the late 1989, they announced a moratorium on animate being testing of its products. Sadly, in 2012 they started testing on animals again when they made the decision to join the Chinese market. This means they are now no longer cruelty-free.

For a cruelty-free alternative to their SPF Foundation, effort Balm Shelter from theBalm.

29. Dolce & Gabbana

Dolce & Gabbana is owned by Coty. They share their parent company's policy to exam where required by law. Equally they sell their products in the Chinese marketplace, they cannot be considered a cruelty-free brand.

Two similar options to D&G'southward popular Luminous Cheek Color Blush are Marc Jacob'due south Air Blush and Tarte's Amazonian Clay Chroma.

thirty. Shu Uemura

Owned by Fifty'Oreal, Shu Uemura shares their parent visitor'due south policy to exam on animals where required by law. Since they sell their products in mainland China where animal testing is mandatory for foreign cosmetics, they are not a cruelty-free brand.

For cruelty-free (and easier to observe) alternatives to Shu Uemura's iconic eyelash curlers, try the ones from Tarte and Tweezerman!

Cruelty-Gratuitous Alternatives

While these brands may accept made the unfortunate choice to test on animals, there are SO many amazing cruelty-gratuitous brands to choose from. Check out our Ultimate Guide to Cruelty-Free + Vegan Makeup Brands to become started on building your perfect cruelty-free makeup kit!

Share On Pinterest

Pivot the graphic beneath to share this list on Pinterest.

Which Brands Are Cruelty-Complimentary?

Download our list of 600+ verified cruelty-gratuitous brands straight to your device. Bring it with you everywhere you go, and never worry about supporting animal testing once again. Click here to download

Source: https://www.crueltyfreekitty.com/cruelty-free-101/makeup-brands-that-test-on-animals/

Posted by: howardsheardiscas.blogspot.com